Sudhakar Singh’s resignation has 4 messages to the public: First – how is the Nitish government running; Second – Can’t survive with the Chief Minister

Nitish Kumar and Sudhakar Singh. – file photo

The resignation of Law Minister Kartikeya Singh did not raise questions, but the resignation of Agriculture Minister Sudhakar Singh is raising questions. Because the public knows about both. This time there are questions on the way of working of the government to agricultural schemes. The question is on Nitish Kumar’s agriculture road map, 2006’s mandi law and system of PACS. After the resignation of Sudhakar Singh, a different message has gone to the common people.

These four types of messages went –

1. Sudhakar Singh was becoming an obstacle in the way of Tejashwi Yadav becoming the Chief Minister!

2. No one can survive by fighting with Chief Minister Nitish Kumar!

3. How is Nitish government working and saving whom!

4. Government does not want discussion on the question raised on Agriculture Road Map, Mandi Act and PACS!

The tussle with the Chief Minister became heavy in the cabinet meeting!

In the cabinet meeting, the tussle with the Chief Minister can overwhelm any minister. This message went from the government. Nitish Kumar, Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, N. He praised Sarwan and made it clear what he wanted. On the other hand, Sudhakar Singh kept making it clear with his statements that he will not sit silent, he will keep telling the truth. Sudhakar had even talked about taking action against the officers. Instead of apologizing for his statement, Sudhakar gave a message by resigning from the post of minister.

‘Sudhakar was speaking the truth, he was martyred’

Bhaskar spoke to senior journalist Ravi Upadhyay. He said that Sudhakar Singh was made a scapegoat. Sudhakar was telling the truth. They were questioning the policies of Nitish Kumar by speaking on the market system and agriculture road map. Even while in government, they were making the government uncomfortable. In such a situation, he had no option. Sudhakar’s tactful move was that he sent his resignation to Deputy Chief Minister Tejashwi Yadav that you have a ball in your court. Accept it or send it to the Chief Minister. His resignation was conveyed to the Chief Minister by the Deputy Chief Minister and then sent to the Raj Bhavan.

Sudhakar was raising his voice against corruption. The principal was vocal against the secretary, but no action was being taken against him. They were saying that farmers are not getting urea, farmers are not getting the right seeds. The government did not take action but removed Sudhakar. Martyred.

‘New generation minister resigns, Chief Minister’s image hurt’

Senior journalist Dhruv Kumar says that everything is not going smoothly in the Nitish-Tejashwi government, it is well known. The manner in which the police is acting in the case of sand mafia, be it the question or the resignation of Sudhakar, suffices to tell. Sudhakar’s resignation sent a message that even a minister cannot openly speak against corruption!

Sudhakar Singh talked about reforms after understanding the department. The minister is the representative of the people and Sudhakar has a vision related to agriculture. He is a new generation minister. He has not left the ministerial post out of hobby. In such a situation, the face of a sensitive Chief Minister should have been visible, so I would say that the message has gone wrong. It is possible that pressure has been put on Tejashwi Yadav to get him to resign. This resignation is a question on good governance and the image of the Chief Minister has been dented.